Our Mission
We aim to share the intrinsic joys of inquiry as well as to nurture the development of higher-level thinking skills, empowering our participants to become aware, determined, expressive members of their communities. We are part of a global movement in Public Philosophy and Philosophy for Children.
One of central notions we plan to teach through the center is the notion of a paradox. A paradox is a set of considerations that seem to pull our intuitions in opposing directions, such as the classical tensions between free will and determinism and between honesty and kindness.
Most unanswered questions in philosophy, science, history, mathematics, and even in court, can be framed as a paradox. To make such abstract, enduring human questions tangible, we connect them with everyday examples and experiences of our participants. We aim to use the tools of philosophical inquiry to improve habits of asking questions, self-directed learning, and critical reflection.
The center also introduces children to methods of inquiry that have been made precise in analytic philosophy and span across the sciences. Philosophers ask, for example, what conditions are necessary for an entity to meet in order for the entity to count as a mind, or to count as knowledge, or to count as morally good, and what conditions are sufficient? We can think of the scientific discovery that water is H2O as involving the same kind of analysis, done in the laboratory rather than in the imagination. We can teach children to think in this way by using either common philosophical topics or we can use topics that may be more readily interesting for children. We may ask, for example, what it takes for something to count as a cake. Is it necessary for it to be baked? Is it necessary for it to be edible? Is it sufficient for it to come from a cake shop? Is it sufficient to look like a cake? These exercises will also allow children to learn further notions relating to inquiry, such as the notion of a hypothesis (e.g., the hypothesis that in order for something to be a cake it is necessary for it to be sweet), the notion of a counter-example (e.g., a crab cake is a cake that isn’t sweet), and the notion of a thought experiment (imagine if we were to make a cake accidentally using salt instead of sugar, will it still be a cake, albeit a bad one?). These methods span all disciplines of inquiry but are made explicit and immediately available through philosophy.